search

8.4 Competitive Positioning

hashtag
vs. Polymarket:

  • More capital-efficient (LMSR vs. CLOB)

  • Platform ecosystem (vs. single interface)

  • Creator economics (perpetual fees)

  • Multi-outcome native support

hashtag
vs. Augur:

  • Better UX (Solana vs. Ethereum)

  • Lower fees (0.4% vs. variable)

  • Instant liquidity (no LP needed)

  • Active platform development

hashtag
vs. Monaco Protocol:

  • Broader use cases (not just sports)

  • Fair value distribution (4-tier fees)

  • Permissionless platforms

  • Superior multi-outcome support

hashtag
Unique Value Propositions:

  1. Zero Capital Requirements: Launch markets with $0 protocol reserves

  2. Phased Dynamic LMSR: True LMSR behavior with zero protocol risk

  3. Platform Revenue Share: Earn 0.1% building interfaces

  4. Creator Economics: Perpetual 0.1% fee stream

  5. Zero Settlement Risk: Winners paid by losers, protocol never at risk

  6. BOUNDING Protection: Full refund if market never activates

  7. Multi-Outcome Native: N-way markets from day one

Previous8.3 Distribution ChannelsNext9. Competitive Analysis

Last updated